top of page

LS | HK Legco & Filibustering

Writer's picture: CloverlistCloverlist

Updated: Aug 24, 2018


Coat of arms of Legco, from Wikipedia

Enquiry Questions

1. What is the function of the Legislative Council and combination of law-makers?

2. Can the Legislative Council represent citizens and perform its function?

3. Is it appropriate to use filibuster in the Legislative Council?

4. Apart from institutional drawbacks, why can't the Legco perform its funtion?

5. The impact of Oath-taking saga and "DQ incident" on Legco and political development in HK


Key Concepts

Geographical Constituency

Split Voting System

Check and Balance

(Traditional) Functional Constituency

Political power/ spectrum

Filibuster

New District Council (Second) Functional Constituency

Representation/ representativeness

Political violence

Hong Kong localism and independence

Pan-democracy Camp

Pro-establishment Camp

Rule of Law

Socio-political participation

Social polatization


Basic Facts: (Basic Law Article 17,68,69,73)

  • Laws enacted by the legislature of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region must be reported to the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress for the record

  • in accordance with the principle of gradual and orderly progress

  • Ultimate aim: the election of all the members of the Legislative Council by universal suffrage

  • Term: Four years

Exercising power of Legco

Enact laws

1. To enact, amend or repeal laws in accordance with the provisions of this Law and Legal procedures

6. To debate any issue concerning public interests


Check and Balance

2. To examine and approve budgets introduced by the government

4. To receive and debate the policy addresses of the Chief Executive

5. To raise questions on the work of the government

7. To endorse the appointment and removal of the judges of the Court of Final Appeal and the Chief Judge of the High Court

9. .. give a mandate to the Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal to form and chair an independent investigation committee if Legco charges the Chief Executive with serious breach of law or dereliction of duty


Control public expenditure

3. To approve taxation and public expenditure


Procedures for voting on bills and motions in the Legislative Council

  • Passage of bills introduced by the government: simple majority vote of the members of the Legislative Council present

  • Passage of motions, bills or amendments to government bills introduced by individual members: simple majority vote of each of the two groups of members present (Functional constituencies & geographical constituencies through direct elections)


Addition of new District Council (second) Functional Constituency (2010 Hong Kong Electoral reform)

--> Equal political rights for every voter?

Yes: every voter has two votes

No: unequal weighting, power to influence the decision of Legco is not the same, New District Council is more competitive than Traditional Functional Constituency


In what extent can the Legislative Council represent citizens?

Legco members from Geographical Constituency &NFC: larger vote base --> more citizens' authorization --> higher representativeness

Legco members from TFC: smaller voter base --> less citizens' authorization --> X representative citizens --> can represent those specific sectors industries to protect their interests



Filibuster (Conflicting Point: Efficiency vs Comprehensive (legitimate))

- an action which aims at obstructing the law-making process

e.g. prolonged speaking, even on very minor issue (proposal of amendment to government bills --> require long discussion time)

e.g. absent --> meeting aborted

Solution: Terminate?


Why did Legislative Councillors use filibuster?

- veto power

- split-voting system (mechanism is fair or not?)

- composition of the legislative council (--> majority is Pan-establishment)

- add pressure -> postpone/ make amendments

Successful example: National education

- (HK) counter-balance the pro-establishment vote allocation machine


Does filibustering in the Legislative Council harm the interest of Hong Kong citizens?


Agree

  • Waste of public funds & time

  • prolonged time discussion without any concrete outcomes, exaggeration on minor issue like usage of wordings, grammar

  • X necessary

  • e.g. Universal Retirement Protection, Old Age Living Allowance (OALA)

  • Pospone/ Delay the implementation of laws --> X help the needy public --> social problem cannot solve --> worsen QoL

Disagree

  • protect the rights of the minority (comprehensive discussion, cater total concerns & interest of different stakeholders)

  • add pressure to the government

  • practicing legislative power on check

Justification

Efficiency vs Comprehensiveness

o Law-making should be put comprehensiveness as the first priority in order to execute the separation of power and improve/ amend the deficits & loopholes in policies

o ↑ efficiency as it will not face much opposition and public opinions

o less conflicts


Hong Kong's political spectrum (Source South China Morning Post November 4, 2016)

Pro-establishment - Diehards of Beijing government and Hong kong SAR government

Pan-democracy - Emerged in 1980s, supported "One Country, Two Systems," while expecting democratization in China and Hong Kong

Radical pro-democracy - Similar to pan-democrats, but they employ more radical instruments both in the Legislative Council and social movements

Localism - In Controversy. Agree with "One Country, Two Systems," but expecting keeping sharp distance to Mainland China and against any Beijing's influence in Hong Kong

Self-determination - the future of Hong Kong should be in the hand of Hong Kong citizens, of which "One Country One System", "One Country Two Systems", or independence all are options for Hong Kong citizens

Unable to be catergorized

5 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comentários


© 2023 by Jessie ST Yeung created with Wix.com

bottom of page